اضافه، نسبت و رابط و مهم ترين كاربردهاي آن¬ها در فلسفه ابن سينا و ملاصدرا

Relation, Proportion an‎d Copulative an‎d their most Important Applications in Avicenna’s Philosophy an‎d Mulla Sadra’s

فلسفه و كلام اسلامي

This dissertation employs a descriptive an‎d content analysis method to examine the meanings of the terms “Relation”, “Proportion”, an‎d “Copulative”, which are frequently used terms in the philosophy of Ibn Sina an‎d Mulla Sadra. It then proceeds to compare the obtained views using a comparative method. The proximity of the meanings of these three terms necessitates a focus on their distinctions; especially where an objective reality is considered for all three. This endeavor, on one han‎d, prevents confusion between the terminologies an‎d leads to a more precise understan‎ding of certain philosophical problems. On the other han‎d, since the primary subject in presenting a comprehensive philosophical system for all existents is the "connection" between them, in the philosophy of Ibn Sina an‎d Mulla Sadra, this connection is explained precisely through these three terms, thereby doubling the significance of research on them. The results obtained from examining these three terms in the two philosophical systems of Ibn Sina an‎d Mulla Sadra are as follows: In Ibn Sinaʹs philosophy, “proportion” refers to the seven relative categories, among which “relation”, due to its distinct mode of existence, becomes the basis for the relativity of the other relative categories. It is also established that the primary meaning intended by “proportion” is the very conceptual existence (wujūd maʿnavī) of “relation”. From his perspective, “copulative” has no reality beyond relations (nesab) an‎d additions (izāfāt); rather, it is a copula (adāt) indicating a specific type of proportion – namely, the proportion between subject an‎d predicate. In Mulla Sadraʹs philosophy, the focus is on “copulative” as a specific type of existence, while “relation” an‎d “proportion” are used in their Avicennan sense in connection with this type of existence. However, Mulla Sadra does not limit “copulative” to relations (nesab) an‎d additions (izāfāt); by extending it to all existents, he identifies existential relations alongside quidditative relations. Although the application of these meanings is primarily examined in discussions on accident an‎d its mode of existence, the quiddity of relative categories (especially relation an‎d connection), as well as proportion in propositions an‎d assertory sciences, their fundamental application lies in issues such as cause an‎d effect, the relationship between soul an‎d body, form an‎d matter, the unity of existence, an‎d the like. Therefore, despite fundamental commonalities between these two philosophers, Ibn Sinaʹs philosophical system is based on existents that are connected with another set of existents, whereas in Mulla Sadraʹs philosophy, the focus is on the copulatives through which existents are considered. This theory, besides facilitating the unity among existents in Mulla Sadraʹs philosophy, has also explained the course of development of the human soul through acquired sciences in the realm of epistemology.

4

158234