چكيده لاتين
The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of implementing the Work Intervention Network (WIN) program for unemployed graduates, with a focus on evaluating its implementability, acceptability, and effectiveness. The research was conducted within an exploratory sequential mixed-methods framework, comprising four phases: a systematic literature review, a pilot embedded mixed-methods study, a main quasi-experimental implementation with a control group, and finally, a qualitative study. Data collection tools included validated questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
Quantitative findings indicated the interventionʹs significant effectiveness in reducing self-blame and increasing to job search engagement. Furthermore, a comparison of the two implementation formats (extensive vs. intensive) showed the relative superiority of the intensive format in improving social support, reducing social isolation, and decreasing self-blame (p < .05). Qualitative analysis of data from interviews with participants, facilitators, and experts confirmed the programʹs multidimensional effectiveness in facilitating cognitive transformation, redefining professional identity, developing social networks, fostering psychological self-empowerment, enhancing self-care, and promoting the application of practical job-search strategies. The acceptability assessment of the intervention also indicated high satisfaction and the contentʹs relevance to the target communityʹs needs.
During the research, an analysis of the concept of decent work within the interventionʹs context led to the extraction of 13 key components, such as job security, fair financial compensation, value alignment, workplace health, and work-life balance.
In conclusion, the results overall demonstrate the implementability, high acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the Work Intervention Network (WIN) program in the context of Iranian society. The study suggests that this program, after implementing minor modifications to the session structure and considering individual differences and local considerations, should be utilized in broader schemes by career counseling centers and employment trustee organizations.
