چكيده لاتين
Natural disasters are often considered a threat to human and the environment. Drought, flood, Invasion of plant pests, Infectious diseases, Heavy snowfall were the most common natural disasters in Isfahan province during the Pahlavi Sources and documents show that the villages of the province have been damaged more and more severely than the cities due to the dependence of the agricultural economy on weather conditions and the fragility of the physical environment. human casualties, psychological effects, loss of agricultural products, famine, Psychological tensions, canals, earthen dams, roads, loss of cattle and reconstruction costs can be counted among the effects of natural crises in the province. In addition to the direct damages of social damage such as, disruption of social order and security, the aggravation of poverty, unemployment and migration should also be added to them. The occurrence of natural disasters cannot be prevented, but managing them reduces damage. Accordingly, planning for anticipation, prevention if possible or damage reduction, preparedness, and how to deal with the crisis and the reconstruction phase is an inevitable necessity and part of the national development process. because these incidents hinder the progress of construction projects and and they threaten societyʹs human and material resources. so, the construction plans and regulations approved during the Pahlavi period can be inferred as an attempt to better understand and better manage these crises. The present study intends to answer the question that what was the performance of the government in the field of natural crisis management in Isfahan province during the Pahlavi period? This research explains this issue with a descriptive and analytical method based on library sources and documents. The findings of the research show that despite the approval of programs and the creation of various institutions due to weak management and planning, the inconsistency and dispersion of responsibilities between executive bodies, development programs, administrative and economic centralization, financial, human and equipment limitations, The governmentʹs strategy in crisis management has remained at the level of Emergency response after Occurrence of natural disasters and compensation for damages and did not succeed in creating and strengthening a proper network of natural crisis management.
