چكيده لاتين
Adolescence is a crucial stage in individual development, and the capacity for mentalization—the ability to understand one’s own and others’ emotions, intentions, and perspectives—plays a significant role during this period. This capacity is influenced by a wide variety of factors. The family and its characteristics, as an influential institution in the developmental stages of children, constitute an important category of factors determining the level of mentalization capacity in adolescents. Given the theoretical importance of this component, the present study was designed and implemented with the aim of determining familial factors influencing mentalization capacity in adolescents.This was a descriptive-correlational study. The statistical population included adolescent girls and boys aged 13 to 18 and their mothers in the academic year 2024-2025. The study sample consisted of 376 adolescents aged 13 to 18 (200 girls and 176 boys) and their mothers, who were selected by cluster random sampling from first and second-grade high schools in Isfahan. To collect research data, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youth (RFQ-Y), Baumrind’s Parenting Styles Inventory (BPSI), the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), and the Epistemic Trust and Mistrust Questionnaire (ETMCQ) were used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26 software based on Pearson correlation and stepwise regression methods.The results showed that secure attachment has a positive and significant relationship with mentalization capacity and both scale A and scale B. In contrast, avoidant attachment showed a negative and significant relationship with these same variables. Regarding parenting styles, the authoritative style had a positive relationship with mentalization capacity, especially scale B, and the authoritarian style had a negative relationship, while the permissive style showed no significant relationship. Mothers’ epistemic trust also had a positive relationship with mentalization capacity and scale B, whereas epistemic mistrust had no significant relationship, and naivety showed only a negative relationship with scale B. Consequently, secure attachment style and mothers’ authoritative parenting style are positive and significant predictors of adolescents’ mentalization capacity. Conversely, mothers’ avoidant attachment style was associated with a decrease in this capacity. Furthermore, epistemic trust, as the “communication highway” between mother and adolescent, had a positive and significant impact on adolescents’ mentalization capacity. The findings of the present study confirm the effective role of familial factors, including attachment style, parenting style, and mothers’ epistemic trust, in the formation of adolescents’ mentalization capacity. These results emphasize the necessity of paying attention to these factors in families and designing preventive, educational, and therapeutic interventions for parents to enhance these capacities in adolescents.