ارزيابي ميزان وجود شاخص‌هاي كيفيت در دوره كارشناسي رشته مهندسي پزشكي دانشگاه اصفهان

eva‎luation , Quality , Medical Engineering , Content , Teaching processes , Laboratory resources and equipment , , University of Isfahan

eva‎luation of the existence of quality indicators in the undergraduate of Medical Engineering in University of Isfahan

علوم تربيتي

The present research was conducted with the aim eva‎luating the existence of quality indicators in the field of Medical Engineering in University of Isfahan, from the point of view of undergraduate students. This research was applied in terms of purpose and its main approach was quantitative. At the same time, the embedded design was also used. According to its purpose, the statistical population of the research was the undergraduate students of Medical Engineering in University of Isfahan who entered the university in 2018 and 2019. Since the opinions of the third and fourth year students were more correct and they had more experience, they were selected as the research population. According to the type of research, random sampling method was used to select the students and the sample size was estimated with the Krejcie and Morgan table. Due to the 121 people in the statistical population, the sample was determined to be 90 people. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. Content validity was used to determine the validity of the questionnaire. For this purpose, the validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by 6 faculty members in the fields of Education and Medical Engineering. The reliability of the questionnaire was obtained with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient by SPSS software, 0.82. The findings of the questionnaire were analyzed through inferential statistical tests in SPSS software. The results showed that, in general, the amount of quality indicators in the Medical Engineering was eva‎luated at an average and relatively favorable level. Based on this, the amount of quality indicators in the content and the human resources components was eva‎luated as average and relatively favorable; in the teaching processes as somewhat favorable, and in relation to the resource and laboratory equipment as unfavorable. The results of three open-ended questions showed that the students made suggestions in some subjects and fields that could be taken into consideration.

5